JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 22, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra El Auto Del 2 De Junio De 2009, Que Rechazó La Demanda Contra La Ley 1150 De 2007, La Demanda Fue Rechazada Por Carecer De Contenido Normativo Autónomo Que Permita Realizar Un Juicio Sobre Su Constitucionalidad. La Corte Decide Que La Solicitud Formulada No Esta Llamada A Prosperar, Por La Indebida Formulación Del Concepto De Violación.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Carga mínima de argumentación
  • Concepto de violación
  • Cargos deben ser claros, ciertos, específicos, pertinentes y suficientes
  • Carácter rogado
  • Requisitos mínimos
1 topic · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del 02 de junio de 2009, que rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Alfonso Beltran Garcia contra la Ley 1150 de 2007.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.